A National Securities Arbitration & Investment Fraud Law Firm

Articles Posted in FINRA Arbitration

FINRA Bars Broker Michael Talin From Securities Industry on silverlaw.com

Allegations include elder financial fraud, misappropriation of funds and unsuitable recommendations

Michael Talin, a former broker associated with Woodbury Financial Services, has been barred from the securities industry by FINRA after failing to cooperate with agency investigators. An investigation was launched after customers alleged that he misappropriated and converted more than $300,000 in customer funds.

According to the BrokerCheck report, Woodbury Financial discharged Talin after he failed to disclose three tax liens and civil complaints against him to the firm. He had previously been registered with Woodbury’s Seal Beach branch in California since 1998 and had worked in the Los Alamitos location since the year 2000.

Tiffany Peacock-Asakawa Gets 10-Month Suspension Following Allegations of False Representation and Document Falsification on silverlaw.com

Broker was also fined $15,000 for accepting trade orders she was not licensed to accept

Tiffany Peacock-Asakawa was suspended from practicing in the securities industry for 10 months in August, following allegations that she was involved in false representation and the falsification of records of trade orders at her member firm, according to FINRA.

According to FINRA reports, Peacock-Asakawa allegedly accepted trade orders that she was not licensed to accept, as she was not registered as a financial adviser in Hawaii. Sanctions were levied against her in the form of a 10-month suspension from the industry and a $15,000 fine.

Massachusetts-based Broker Jeffrey B. Pierce Permanently Barred by FINRA on silverlaw.com

Allegations include conversion of funds from non-securities customer account

After thirteen years in the securities industry, Jeffrey Pierce has been permanently barred from practicing in the securities industry in any capacity. During his career, Pierce accumulated eleven disclosure events, including regulatory events, a criminal event, customer disputes and two employer terminations.

The most recent complaint, according to FINRA’s BrokerCheck report, alleges that Pierce circumvented the procedures of his member firm in order to conceal unsuitable annuity replacement transactions.

UBS to Pay FINRA Claimants $3M in Puerto Rico Muni Bond Case non silverlaw.com

FINRA arbitration panel finds bank liable in alleged fraud claim

As Puerto Rico’s financial struggles continue, a FINRA arbitration panel awarded three claimants $3M in an alleged fraud claim against UBS Financial Services in early September.

According to Law360.com, the claimants alleged that the bank committed fraud relating to closed-end funds and muni bonds, and how the bank used those investments as collateral to borrow funds through lines of credit. Included in the complaint were allegations of breach of fiduciary duty, negligence and breach of contract against UBS.

Both brokers barred following termination from same firm

LPL Financial LLC

One broker had over 30 years’ experience in the securities industry. One broker had only one year of experience in the securities industry. Yet both brokers were terminated from LPL Financial LLC within a month of each other.

According to the FINRA BrokerCheck website, both Thomas H. Caniford and Andrew M. Carter were terminated earlier this year from the firm for what seem to be fairly similar reasons.

Morgan Stanley has found itself on the wrong end of a Florida FINRA arbitration for claimed damages of $400 million. Lynnda Speer, the widow of Home Shopping Network (HSN) co-founder Roy M. Speer, filed the claim against Morgan Stanley and one of its branch managers and investment advisers. Due to its size, the firm acknowledged the claim in a disclosure in its annual financial report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in March.

In addition to being the widow of Mr. Speer, Ms. Speer is the personal representative of his estate. In her claim, filed with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), she alleges excessive trading, negligent supervision, and unjust enrichment. According to a SEC filing, the claims also include that Morgan Stanley and the adviser, working out of Palm Harbor, Florida, engaged in the unauthorized use of discretion and abused their fiduciary duty.

After helping to create the popular HSN, it was estimated by Forbes that Mr. Speer was worth $775 million in 2002. Before passing away in 2012, Mr. Speer suffered from “significant diminished capacity” during the later years of his life. It is alleged that during the final five years of his life, his adviser, Ami Forte, and the firm conducted roughly 12,000 unauthorized trades, which generated around $40 million in commissions. Also named in the suit is the Morgan Stanley branch manager, Terry McCoy.

According to the Financial Fraud Research Center, Americans lose $50 billion each year to fraud. Further, research funded by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Education Foundation (Foundation) discovered that roughly 80 percent of consumers over the age of 40 said they had been solicited for a potentially fraudulent scheme. In order to combat this, the Foundation has developed an interactive game designed to educate investors on how to spot the tactics used by individuals who commit fraud.

“Con ‘Em If You Can”

The game, called “Con ‘Em If You Can,” was developed by the Foundation and the D2D Fund. It is intended to provide an entertaining way for investors to learn about fraudulent tactics. Fraud criminals use persuasion to take advantage of investors. Often, these individuals ask investors about such items as their health, family, and hobbies and use that information to complete their fraudulent acts. Fraudulent schemes may include promising a quick path to wealth or leading investors to believe that there is a limited supply for something.

A customer of Wells Fargo Advisors filed a FINRA complaint against Wells Fargo to seek the money he lost when his adviser invested his monies in “F-Squared Investments.”  The customer’s claim is that Wells Fargo failed to supervise his adviser properly, and also did not do the required due diligence in the investment that he recommended (F-Squared).  The customer is also seeking lost opportunity damages, which is the money he could have made if his money were invested in an S&P 500 Fund.

The SEC launched an investigation into F-Squared Investments and its co-founder and CEO Howard Present, in 2013.   According to the SEC’s Order of December 2014, F-Squared Investments agreed to pay $35 million and admit wrongdoing to settle charges that it defrauded investors through false advertising about its flagship product (AlphaSector).  The SEC alleged that while marketing AlphaSector into the largest active ETF (“exchange-traded funds”) strategy in the market, F-Squared falsely advertised a successful seven-year track record for the investment strategy based on the actual performance of real investments for real clients.  In reality, the algorithm was not even in existence during the seven years of purported performance success.  The data used in F-Squared’s advertising was actually derived through backtesting, although F-Squared and Howard Present specifically advertised the investment strategy as “not backtested.” Further, the hypothetical data contained a substantial performance calculation error that inflated the results by approximately 350 percent.

According to news reports, the customer in this case is an elderly person who claims that Wells Fargo did not perform due diligence on investments prior to selling them to the public.  Additionally, the customer claims that Wells Fargo failed to properly supervise one of its advisers and recommendations the advisor made to the client, who described himself as a “moderately conservative investor seeking moderately conservative growth”, concerning his investment risk.  The client claims that had Wells Fargo conducted full due diligence on the F-Squared product, it would have discovered red flags, additionally seeing that the ETF-based F-Squared product was not appropriate for a moderately conservative investor.

The Silver Law Group has filed a securities arbitration claim before the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) on behalf of a family and a family business from South America alleging, among other things, that Dawson James failed to properly supervise one of its registered representatives, permitted an unsuitable investment strategy to be utilized and permitted the family’s investment accounts to be excessively traded for the purposes of generating huge commissions for itself and its registered representatives while wiping out most of their customers’ investment capital in a very short period of time.

Excessive trading or “churning,” as it is known in the industry, is the act of a broker who excessively and needlessly engages in trading in a client’s account primarily to generate commissions for the broker on each trade without regard for the client’s financial well-being.  Churning is an illegal and unethical practice that violates SEC rules and securities laws.

Dawson James Securities markets itself as a full service investment firm specializing in complex healthcare, biotechnology, technology, and clean-tech sectors.  Headquartered in Boca Raton, Florida, the firm has been in operation since 2002.  Dawson James has been the subject of several regulatory investigations, some which resulted in disciplinary actions by regulators.  For example, FINRA recently censured and fined Dawson James $75,000 for failing to provide adequate supervisory procedures.  FINRA found that during the review period the firm failed to investigate numerous “red flags” relating to the activities of one registered representative.  Dawson James also failed to enforce its written supervisory procedures which specified that all electronic correspondence is reviewed on a daily basis.  The firm has also been the subject of several customer FINRA arbitration claims.

According to FINRA, Thomas Tedeschi has recently been named in a securities arbitration lawsuit against him and his former employer, Aegis Capital Corp., for making unsuitable investments, unauthorized trades, misrepresentations and excessive trading (churning), among other claims.  The assertions against him involve speculative securities that include penny stocks and Exchange Traded Notes.  Mr. Tedeschi is required by law to only recommend or engage in transactions that are suitable to their individual client, and not to excessively trade in their accounts.  This type of trading may be considered stockbroker misconduct called churning.  The excessive buying and selling is done for the purpose of generating commissions for the broker, and not to benefit the client.  In fact, it almost always results in enormous losses to the client.

Thomas Tedeschi began his stockbroker career in 1994 and has been employed by 17 different brokerage firms since then, seven of which have been expelled from the brokerage industry by FINRA for violations of the law and misconduct.  It is quite a shocking record.  Additionally, Aegis Capital Corp. has many claims against it, including 17 final regulatory violations that were filed by FINRA, NASDAQ Stock Market, and other regulatory bodies, for such violations as market manipulation, excessive buying and selling of illicit microcap stocks, failure to supervise and failure to disclose, late trade reporting, and other violations of NASD Rules and Texas Securities Acts as well.  There is one regulatory violation claim currently pending.  Aegis Capital Corp has also been fined on numerous occasions and has been suspended in the past from acting as a market maker.

If you invested money with Thomas Tedeschi or Aegis Capital Corp. and suffered losses, you may be entitled to recover some or all of those investment losses.  Please call our securities law firm toll free at (800) 975-4345 to speak with an experienced attorney and to find out how we may be able to help you regain some or all of your investment losses.  Most cases are handled on a contingent fee basis, meaning that you do not pay legal fees unless we are successful in your lawsuit.

Contact Information