Unsuitable Investment Advice

Meyers Associates Broker Matthew Siliato Under Investigation for Pending Suitability and Breach of Fiduciary Duty Claims

August 16, 2016 | Silver Law Group

Silver Law Group is investigating Meyers Associates broker Matthew A. Siliato (CRD# 5062153) for recent allegations that he recommended clients unsuitable investments.

Siliato’s Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) BrokerCheck report indicates that the broker has nine misconduct disclosures.

Siliato’s most recent complaint was filed on June 23, 2016. The customer dispute alleges unsuitable recommendations and damages in the amount of $250,000. The complaint is currently pending.

Lawrence LaBine Under Fire for Alleged Unsuitable Recommendations and More

August 13, 2015 | Silver Law Group

Newbridge securities advisor allegedly has conflict of interest between software company and his clients

According to FINRA, Lawrence Michael LaBine is the subject of a disciplinary action pending against him after an alleged conflict of interest leading to several customer disputes.

In his 29 years in the securities industry, LaBine has had 30 disclosures according to FINRA, many of which are related to his alleged relationship with a sinking software company, leading him to make what clients claimed to be inappropriate recommendations.

AlphaBridge Capital Management Charged By SEC for Fraudulent Fund Valuation Scheme

August 5, 2015 | Silver Law Group

Hedge fund firm owners agree to $5 million combined settlement

On June 1, 2015 the Securities and Exchange Commission charged Greenwich, Connecticut-based AlphaBridge Capital Management and its two owners with fraudulently inflating the prices of securities in funds they managed. These inflated valuations caused the funds to pay higher management and performance fees to AlphaBridge.

According to the SEC news release, AlphaBridge Capital Management and its owners – Thomas T. Kutzen and Michael J. Carino – “told investors and its auditor that it obtained independent price quotes from broker-dealers for certain unlisted, thinly-traded residential mortgage-backed securities.” In fact, what the firm did was give “internally-derived valuations to broker-dealers to pass off as their own.”

Silver Law Group Investigates FINRA-Barred Broker Thomas Buck

July 30, 2015 | Silver Law Group

Silver Law Group is investigating Indiana-based stockbroker Thomas Buck, who earlier this week was barred by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) from associating with any FINRA member firm and was accused by FINRA of improperly charging customers and engaging in unauthorized trading. Mr. Buck, a former top broker for Bank of America Merrill Lynch from 1981 until early-2015, was most recently employed by RBC Wealth Management.

According to FINRA, Buck oversaw $1.3 billion in assets while at Merrill Lynch, which made him Merrill’s top broker in Indiana. Buck is alleged to have almost exclusively steered his clients into using commission-based accounts since at least 2009 despite the fact that it would have been less expensive for the clients to remain in fee-based accounts. In addition, Buck is believed to have placed trades on behalf of clients without obtaining proper authorizations, something that is prohibited under FINRA standards.

“He at times unilaterally placed trades in customer accounts without getting the customers’ acquiescence in advance, or even after placing the trade,” FINRA wrote. “In other instances, customers explicitly or implicitly allowed him to place trades in their account without prior discussion. Buck did not obtain written authorization to do so from either the customers or Merrill Lynch.”

FINRA Suspends James Edward Rooney Jr. for Unauthorized Transactions

January 28, 2015 | Silver Law Group

James Edward Rooney Jr., of Carrollton, Texas, was fined by FINRA a total of $75,000, suspended from association with any FINRA member in any capacity for a total of two years and was suspended in any supervisory capacity for 18 months. FINRA alleges that Rooney engaged in private securities transactions involving installment contracts without providing prior written notice his member firm. The findings stated that Rooney recommended the installment contract to his client without a reasonable basis for believing it to be a suitable investment. Rooney allegedly did not conduct a reasonable investigation into the company offering the installment plan contracts or the contracts themselves. Rooney sold the product expecting to receive a commission. The findings also stated that Rooney made negligent misrepresentations of material fact to the customer. Although Rooney may not have known that his representations regarding the organization and the features of the contract were false, a simple investigation would have uncovered numerous red flags. Rooney also presented oversimplified, incomplete and misleading sales materials to his customer when soliciting the installment contract. The findings also included that Rooney failed to adequately supervise other registered representative’s sales of the installment contracts. (FINRA Case #2009019042402)

If you invested money with James Edward Rooney Jr., you may be entitled to recover some of your investment losses. Please call our securities law firm toll free at (800) 975-4345 to speak to an attorney to find out how we may be able to help you recover some of your investment losses through FINRA arbitration.

Stephen Eldridge Ridgely, II Barred from Securities Industry

January 16, 2015 | Silver Law Group

Silver Law Group is investigating Stephen Eldridge Ridgely, II who was suspended by FINRA for failing to respond to FINRA requests for information.

Mr. Ridgely was registered with Ameriprise Financial Services, Inc.’s Plantation, Florida office from September 2012 through March 2014. Prior to that time, he was registered with Merrill Lynch’s Coral Springs, Florida office.

According to Mr. Ridgely’s BrokerCheck Report, he was the subject of a FINRA arbitration claim alleging unauthorized transactions which settled in August 2014. In November 2013, Merrill Lynch settled another claim involving Mr. Ridgely for $745,000 relating to claims alleging unauthorized trading, unsuitable investments and excessive trading.

Chapin Davis Settles Claims Relating to Structured Notes

January 16, 2015 | Silver Law Group

Chapin Davis, Inc., of Baltimore, Maryland, submitted an AWC in which the firm was censured and fined by FINRA $35,000. Without admitting or denying the findings, Chapin Davis agreed to the sanctions and to the findings in connection with the sale of structured products, the firm’s supervisory system and WSPs were inadequate. The findings stated that the firm sold approximately $24.5 million in structured notes and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) insured structured certificates of deposit (CDs) to retail customers. The firm did not have a system or WSPs for evaluating and conducting due diligence on the products, including determining risks and suitability issues, as applicable, and for approving the products. The firm offered limited training on the products, and its WSPs did not specifically address the products or provide guidance or restrictions unique to the products, including assessment or consideration of customer-specific suitability, as applicable. In addition, the firm did not sufficiently review transactions in the products, including monitoring of accounts for overconcentration of the products. (FINRA Case #2012030601701)

Silver Law Group represents investors in securities and investment fraud cases. Our lawyers are admitted to practice in New York and Florida and represent investors nationwide to help recover investment losses due to stockbroker misconduct. If you have any questions about how your account has been handled, call to speak with an experienced securities attorney. Most cases handled on a contingent fee basis meaning that you do not pay legal fees unless we are successful.

Silver Law Group is Investigating NSM Securities, Inc.

December 3, 2014 | Silver Law Group

NSM Securities, Inc. (CRD #134357, West Palm Beach, Florida) and Niyukt Raghu Bhasin (CRD #2282048, Wellington, Florida) submitted an Offer of Settlement to FINRA in which NSM Securities (“NSM”) was expelled from FINRA membership. Bhasin was barred from association with any FINRA member in any capacity. NSM and Bhasin consented to the FINRA sanctions and that the firm, acting through and at the direction of its founder, owner, President and Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Bhasin, derived most of its revenue from actively and aggressively trading stocks in the commission-based accounts of its retail customers. This practice is frequently referred to as churning. Bhasin allegedly put his firm’s profits over the duties owed to its customers and chose not to enforce a supervisory system effective for the firm’s business. NSM, through Bhasin, failed to establish, maintain and enforce a system, including written supervisory procedures (WSPs), to supervise its core activity, an active and aggressive investment strategy. The firm, through Bhasin, failed to monitor for, detect and prevent churning, excessive trading, related violations of Regulation T, and unsuitable investment recommendations, and failed to adequately review e-mail, adequately handle customer complaints or place questionable brokers who were the subjects of multiple FINRA arbitrations or customer complaints and arbitrations on heightened supervision.

FINRA also stated that in implementing Bhasin’s active and aggressive trading strategy, and in order to generate commissions, the firm committed multiple margin violations and the related FINRA rules governing the extension of credit or margin. Specifically, the firm, acting through its brokers, made a practice of allowing customers to buy securities in cash accounts where the cost to buy the securities was met by the sale of the same securities, known as free-riding. All of these actions ultimately led to an environment which allowed brokers to churn customer accounts to make a profit for the firm. NSM specifically targeted Indian investors preying on sharing cultural similarities. This is frequently referred to as affinity fraud.

FINRA also found that the firm, through Bhasin, failed to institute adequate procedures for cold-calling prospective customers. As a result, the firm, through its brokers and other representatives, initiated telephone solicitations to persons whose numbers were on the firm’s do-not-call list and/or the national do-not-call list. (FINRA Case #2011027667402)

Merrill Lynch Hedge Fund Investors Offered Opportunity To Exit The Endowment Fund With Substantial Losses

March 7, 2014 | Silver Law Group

According to recent SEC filings, the Endowment Master Fund LP, has offered investors an exit strategy from the hedge fund offering a new fund through a Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) which will be used to liquidate the Fund. The Endowment Master Fund, LP was marketed heavily by Wall Street firms, including Merrill Lynch. The PPM describes the Offer as a like-kind exchange of investors’ pro-rata interest of the portfolio holdings into a new PMF Fund, LP. According to the SEC filings, dated February 20, 2014, “the PMF Fund, LP and the Endowment Master Fund, LP will be managed differently, with the PMF Fund, LP managed for purposes of orderly liquidation.”

For investors, the Offer provides little certainty because investors must choose whether to liquidate now without knowing the true value of the Fund which will be determined at a later date. `The Offer for the like-kind exchange expires March 19, 2014 which requires more than a leap of faith for investors in a hedge fund that has languished far behind the market returns. Investors must make an investment decision without knowledge of the value exchanged and how much will be realized during the liquidation period. According to the New York Times article, After Weak Returns, the Endowment Fund Limits Withdrawals, the hedge fund, “began to struggle in 2011, suffering losses of about 4.1 percent, after fees, compared with a gain of 2.5 percent by the S&P 500.”

On February 24, 2014, a Thomson Reuters article underscores the effects of the substantial hedge fund costs on the Funds dismal performance, “Even for investors who stay with the fund, there will be high costs. They will not be permitted to ask for any money back this year. They will also be charged a 1 percent management fee and a 1 percent servicing fee. On top of that there will be the fund’s underlying managers’ 1.3 percent management fee and a 16 percent of profits as an incentive fee.” The article points to the hedge fund underperformance in 2013, “with the fund earning only 2.08 percent last year, dramatically trailing the Standard & Poor’s 32 percent gain.” For Merrill Lynch customer’s, “If investors accessed the Endowment Fund through Merrill Lynch they will have paid as much as a 2.5 percent upfront charge.”

Securities Industry Watchdog Issues Investor Tips For Variable Annuities

March 4, 2014 | Silver Law Group

Be prepared, the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) warns investors, “to ask your insurance agent, broker, financial planner, or other financial professional lots of questions about whether a variable annuity is right for you.“ Investor education is the key to making informed investment decisions, but what questions should be asked? Investors must rely on their advisors because the variable annuity prospectus, frequently 100-plus pages, or more, is convoluted and not easily understood by the Average investor. The SEC recently issued an Investor Tip: Variable Annuities, What You Should Know publication to provide direction for investors.

Variable annuity contracts are considered by many investors complex which leads to their reliance upon the financial advisor who recommends the investment. The terms of the contract which investors should be familiar include:

surrender period;